Search and Access Archived Conference Presentations

The 2010 ASHS Annual Conference

3506:
Differential Orthophosphate Leaching in Empire Zoysiagrass and Floratam St. Augustinegrass

Monday, August 2, 2010: 5:00 PM
Desert Salon 4-6
Ronald Gonzalez, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Jerry B. Sartain, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
George A. O'Connor, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Thomas A. Obreza, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Willie Harris, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Jason Kruse, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Phosphorus (P) fertilization in low P retention soils can result in P leaching to ground water. This study evaluated the effect of P application rate on orthophosphate leaching (OP) and its relationship with plant P uptake. Floratam St. Augustinegrass (SA) (Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt) Kuntze cultivar Floratam) and Empire Zoysiagrass (EZ) (Zoysia japonica cultivar Empire) were grown in an uncoated sand soil with very low extractable P and low P retention capacity. Phosphorus was applied every 4 weeks at a rate of 0, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56 and 1.12 g m-2. Each treatment was replicated four times.  Phosphorus uptake, plant dry matter accumulation, and Mehlich I extractable P were determined biweekly during 120 days (May to August, 2008). In addition, large plastic lysimeters were used to collect leachates, and the amount of OP leached was measured weekly. A decrease (p-value < 0.05) in OP leached with increasing P application rate was observed in SA while OP leached in EZ plots increased with greater P application.  Under the conditions of this study, a cumulative P application of 3.75 g P m-2 and 1.5 g P m-2 in SA and EZ, respectively, did not result in an increase in OP leached in comparison to the no P application treatment. Phosphorus uptake rate of SA across treatments and sampling dates was higher (p-value < 0.0001) than in EZ. Root biomass in SA and EZ was not different (p-value = 0.920); however, root length density in SA was greater than in EZ (p-value < 0.0005).