Co-effectiveness of Supplemental Lighting and Irrigation in Conjunction with Compensation for Midday Depression of Photosynthesis of Cut Roses
Co-effectiveness of Supplemental Lighting and Irrigation in Conjunction with Compensation for Midday Depression of Photosynthesis of Cut Roses
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Ballroom A/B/C (Rosen Plaza Hotel)
Plants grow better in circadian conditions that correspond to natural environments. However, to increase cut rose productivity, supplemental lighting was applied during night period, which might reset the circadian rhythms of the rose crops. Also, previous study indicated that drought stress occurred in none-irrigation regime under nocturnal supplemental lighting. To investigate the effect of supplemental lighting and irrigation during night on diurnal photosynthetic rate, cut rose ‘Charming Black’ was subjected to three treatment: TControl (without supplemental lighting), TSL×NI (PAR 90 without irrigation during night) and TSL×I (PAR 90 with irrigation once per hour). Diurnal photosynthetic rate showed an increasing tendency from 9:00 am and the highest value occurred from 11:00 h to 14:00 h. Then photosynthetic rate decreased from 15:00 h and then remained steady in three treatment conditions. Compared with TControl, TSL×NI demonstrated higher photosynthetic rate during night due to supplemental lighting. Nonetheless, from 9:00 to 15:00, photosynthetic rate was lower than TControl. Under irrigation condition TSL×I, photosynthetic rate increased by 4.96 μmolm-2·s-1 compared with TControl at 13:00 h. Under TSL×NI, photosynthetic rate peak appeared earlier (at about 11:00 h) than TSL×I condition (13:00 h). The Co-effectS-I indicated that irrigation and supplemental lighting compensate for each other to promote the photosynthesis.