Indicates sessions with recordings available.
Comparative Yield Response of Lettuce to a Commercial Seaweed Extract in Two Hydroponic Systems: A Preliminary Evaluation
Comparative Yield Response of Lettuce to a Commercial Seaweed Extract in Two Hydroponic Systems: A Preliminary Evaluation
Wednesday, August 5, 2015: 5:30 PM
Southdown (Sheraton Hotel New Orleans)
Small-scale limited resource hydroponic growers continually seek new strategies to improve the production efficiency and yield of their crop plants. Two hydroponic experiments were conducted to test the effects of a proprietary extract from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (Simplex™; Acadian Agritech, Nova Scotia, Canada), which has been reported to improve the growth of horticultural crops–on the yield of two lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivars (Concept and Nevada). Lettuce seedlings were transferred into either an Ebb-N’ Flow (Ebb&F) or Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) hydroponic system at the two-leaf stage, and grown until market maturity. The nutrient solution treatments comprised of a commercial fertilizer (15N–2.2P–12.5K plus micronutrients) at 200 mg N/liter (N200), 150 mg N/liter (N150) and 150 mg N/liter plus 0.5 ml Simplex™/liter (N150+S). Ambient maximum/minimum (day/night) temperature and RH of the greenhouse during the cropping cycles were 26.6/12.2 °C and 77.5/34.5%, respectively, during October–December for the Ebb&F experiment; and 28/18 °C and 82/42.0%, respectively, during August–October for the NFT experiment. Nutrient solution pH was maintained within 6.5–7.2 with sulfuric acid, and EC ranged from 1.38–1.98 mS/cm for both Ebb&F and NFT systems. In Ebb&F, ‘Concept’ had consistently higher head fresh weight (HFW) and dry weight (HDW) than ‘Nevada’ (P = 0.05). The N150+S treatment increased HFW over N200 and N150 by 15% and 20%, respectively; and HDW over N150 (P = 0.05), but head dry: fresh weight ratio (HDWR) was higher at N200 than either N150 or N150+S (P = 0.05). With ‘Nevada’, N150+S increased HFW and HDW over N150 (P = 0.05), however, there were no differences in HFW or HDW between N150+S and N200. HDWR was significantly higher at N200 than either N150+S or N150 (P = 0.05). In NFT, there was no cultivar effect on HFW (P = 0.05), but ‘Concept’ had significantly higher HDW and HDWR than ‘Nevada’ (P < 0.0001). Similarly, HFW of 'Concept' was higher with N150+S than N200 and N150 by 14% and 24%, respectively; and HDW was increased over N150 by 16% (P = 0.05), however, HDWR was lower with N150+S than either N200 or N150 (P = 0.05). With ‘Nevada’, N150+S increased HFW and HDW over N150 (P = 0.05), however, there were no differences in HFW or HDW between N150+S and N200. Unlike ‘Concept’, neither nutrient solution level nor addition of Simplex™ had any effect on the HDWR of 'Nevada' (P = 0.05).