Search and Access Archived Conference Presentations

2018 ASHS Annual Conference

Comparing Saturation and Particle Density Methods to Derive Substrate Porosity

Thursday, August 2, 2018
International Ballroom East/Center (Washington Hilton)
Paul C. Bartley III, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Brian Eugene Jackson, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
William C. Fonteno, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
The total porosity of substrate components can be derived from indirect measurements such as the North Carolina State University Porometer Method (PM), a saturation method, or calculated from its bulk volume divided by its particle density (ρs). In order to calculate substrate total porosity from ρs, coir, peat, pine bark, perlite, and wood fiber components were analyzed using a helium gas pycnometer. Porometer Method data was collected from the NCSU Horticultural Substrates Lab’s database on single component substrates and compared to the calculated total porosity derived from ρs. The PM’s measured total porosities were consistently lower than the derived total porosity determined by ρs. However, it was observed that the initial moisture content of the substrate prior to being subjected to the PM affected the agreement between the two methods. Assuming the ρs derived total porosity provides the true value, the optimal moisture content to achieve the most accurate results from the PM could be determined for each material.