Search and Access Archived Conference Presentations

The 2011 ASHS Annual Conference

6559:
The Chemistry of a Great Tasting Tomato

Monday, September 26, 2011
Kona Ballroom
Denise Tieman, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Peter Bliss, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Dawn Bies, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Adilia Blandon-Ubeda, Food Science & Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Mark Taylor, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Charles Goulet, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Melissa Hamner Mageroy, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Asli Odabasi, Food Science & Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
David Clark, Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Charles Sims, Food Science & Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Linda Bartoshuk, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville
Harry J. Klee, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
It is widely recognized that the flavor quality of many commercially produced fresh fruits has declined. We have taken a systematic approach to defining the chemical composition of a good-tasting tomato by exploiting the surprisingly large chemical variation found within the species. Tomato flavor is determined by complex interactions of a diverse set of chemicals that are sensed by the taste and olfactory systems. These chemicals include sugars (glucose and fructose), acids (citrate and malate) and a set of less well defined volatiles. We have identified the most important chemicals contributing to good flavor. Knowing how the components of tomato flavor co-vary with preference, and creating a system to ‘engineer’ these preferences constitutes a new direction in the chemistry of human flavor preferences for the tomato fruit specifically, and naturally grown food products in general. Eighty tomato varieties spanning the range of biochemical diversity were tested by consumers to generate a subjective sensory profile of perceptions, including overall liking. A total of 44 sugars, acids and volatiles were either significantly positively or negatively correlated with overall liking. Many of the positively correlated volatiles were not previously associated with tomato flavor. Conversely, several volatiles widely accepted as being important contributors to flavor did not correlate with liking. The lack of correlation for the highly abundant C6 volatiles was validated with transgenic fruits that do not synthesize these volatiles. Finally, regression analysis and reverse engineering created a model, identifying target levels of each flavor chemical that essentially define the recipe for an ideal tomato. This synthetic approach to understanding the chemistry of liking for complex natural products provides breeders with the knowledge to achieve flavor improvements. Such a synthetic approach establishes a formalized method for improving a complex natural food.
See more of: Postharvest Posters 2
See more of: Poster Abstracts